Thomson abortion

Sometimes the mother, but always her son or daughter. The way she analyzes the topic makes one wonder whether she thinks parenting even born children is charity.

This is so despite the fact that this argument — though nearly a quarter of a century old — is now being suggested by a number of legal scholars as a way to circumvent the problems of fetal personhood which they believe were mishandled in Roe v.

Casey was decidedbut the opinion of the Court was essentially divided into three factions. As it turns out, the owner of the third car also owns and drove the car that started the chain reaction.

States were also given more discretion as to when viability begins. As Thomson reminds, the house belongs to the mother; similarly, the body which holds a fetus Thomson abortion belongs to the mother.

Judith Jarvis Thomson

If human beings are not persons before birth, then abortion is not homicide the killing of one person by anotherand from the perspective of rights, there is nothing further to discuss. Abortion Law An overview of the history and legality of abortion in the United States.

Essays for Richard Cartwright.

A Defense of Abortion

The Texas case, Roe v. A woman has Thomson abortion right to her body, but so too a fetus has a right to the uterus that is her biologically-given home. His relationship with his wife, which began at socialist summer camp, was a source of tension for both their families.

Exploring the Abortion Controversy Grand Rapids: She adds to this a very important observation. The opportunity to make such a sweeping declaration came via two cases which both presented constitutional challenges to state criminal abortion laws.

To unplug you would be to kill him. This analogy raises the issue of whether all abortions are unjust killing. Thomson also explicitly rejects the claim that pregnant women have a right to kill their offspring.

U.S. Abortion Law

Wadsworth, The child did not cause the situation. The violinist develops a fatal kidney problem, his friends go to his aid; they capture an innocent stranger and plug the violinist into him; the stranger unplugs himself, which lets the violinist die.

Crossway Books, Three years later, Congress essentially reversed the Court by concluding that there was "a moral, medical, and ethical consensus that partial-birth abortion is a gruesome and inhumane procedure that is never medically necessary and should be prohibited.

It implies some volition on the part of the accused: But a simple journey through the birth canal does not change the essential nature of the entity in question. It simultaneously makes us into individuals and members of a group, and thus embeds in us rights-bearing protections.

What if the stranger had hit the violinist with his car? Here are some of my reasons why her analogy fails.

Judith Jarvis Thomson:

But still, they did it, and the violinist now is plugged into you. The conclusion of fetal humanity by no means ends the argument; it simply forces the striking of a balance….

Abortion debate

That does not mean that humans do not have special moral status; only that moral status comes from being higher up on the spectrum. Parental obligation is not a special obligation, in that acting justly towards everyone else is a universal obligation.

Rarely if ever has something so human, so natural, so beautiful, and so wonderfully demanding of our human creativity and love been reduced to such a brutal caricature. Inabortion again made its way to the Supreme Court, in Planned Parenthood v.

Suppose a couple has a sexual encounter that is fully protected by several forms of birth control short of abortion condom, the Pill, IUD, and so forthbut nevertheless results in conception.

Conception and pregnancy are foreseeable consequences of even careful sex.

Braid: Anti-abortion groups make moves on the UCP

Being the owner of both cars, she can fault only herself.Thomson's View of Abortion In the article "A Defense of Abortion" Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person.

In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. Tarski, Alfred (). Polish-American logician who defended a correspondence theory of truth in The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages () and The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics ().

According to Tarski, we must distinguish between a formal language and its interpretation as applicable within a specific domain, in order to define the truth of. The Moral Status of the Foetus: Philosophical Investigations into the Abortion issue The Nature of the Problem Click here for the.

An analytic examination of the flawed, and the important, arguments on both sides of the abortion debate. "A Defense of Abortion" is a moral philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson first published in Granting for the sake of argument that the fetus has a right to life, Thomson uses thought experiments to argue that the fetus's right to life does not trump the pregnant woman's right to control her own body and its life-support functions, and that induced abortion is therefore not morally.

"A Defense of Abortion" is a moral philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson first published in Granting for the sake of argument that the fetus has a right to life, Thomson uses thought experiments to argue that the fetus's right to life does not trump the pregnant woman's right to control her own body and its life-support functions, and that induced abortion is therefore not morally.

Download
Thomson abortion
Rated 5/5 based on 82 review